33. Procedure where defendant objects to use of the Rule 30 procedure
Past version: effective from 30/05/2016 - 29/05/2016
To view other versions open the versions tab on the right
(1) Where the defendant contends that the Rule 30 procedure should not be used because there is a substantial dispute of fact, because the use of the procedure is not required or permitted by a rule or practice direction, or for some other substantive reason, he must state his reasons when he files his written evidence.
(2) When the Court receives the acknowledgment of service and any written evidence, it will give directions as to the future management of the case.